A Prospective Randomised Control Trial of Mako Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Versus Jig-based Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty With Navigation Contro
The overall aim of this prospective, randomised, single-blinded, controlled trial is to compare clinical outcomes and accuracy of implant positioning in Mako robotic UKA versus jig-based Oxford UKA with navigation control. Patients receiving the Mako robotic UKA (Stryker Ltd) will form the investigation group and those undergoing the jig-based Oxford UKA (Zimmer-Biomet Ltd) with navigation control will form the control group. The primary objective in this study is to compare accuracy of component positioning as assessed by postoperative low radiation dose CT scan between conventional Jig-based Oxford UKA with navigation control and Mako robotic UKA.
• • Patient has medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis requiring primary UKA
‣ Patient and Surgeon are in agreement that UKA is the most appropriate treatment
⁃ Patient is fit for surgical intervention following review by surgeon and anaesthetist
⁃ Patient is between 40-80 years of age at time of surgery
⁃ Gender: male and female
⁃ Patient must be capable of giving informed consent and agree to comply with the postoperative review program
⁃ Patient must be a permanent resident in an area accessible to the study site
⁃ Patient must have sufficient postoperative mobility to attend follow-up clinics and allow for radiographs to be taken